DIGITAL HEALTH

Background Digital legacy (the digital information available about someone following their death) has increasing societal importance as personal assets and interactions become increasingly digitized. Healthcare professionals often have a limited understanding of how to address digital legacy in practice, and there is a lack of interdisciplinary networks to improve education, research, and professional development in digital legacy. Objective This paper describes the development of an interdisciplinary initiative designed to build research capacity and develop consensus-based recommendations for integrating digital legacy into palliative care. Method Over 12-months, we conducted interdisciplinary engagement activities with diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, designers, and sociologists. We used a modified World Cafe method to facilitate dialogue and capture feedback on how memories are digitally curated, the management of digital estates, and intergenerational perspectives on digital legacy. Results We identified eight core recommendations for research and policy, including promoting digital legacy education, supporting policy development, and broadening the scope of interdisciplinary research. Our discussions highlighted the complexity of modern digital estates and the need for legal and ethical frameworks to protect individual rights. Conclusions The Network demonstrates that interdisciplinary collaboratives can address important issues relating to digital legacy, which provides a foundation to conduct collaborative research that improves the management of digital legacies in society.

Background Stroke remains one of the leading causes of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with low- and middle-income countries bearing a disproportionate share of the global disease burden. In India, delays in risk identification, fragmented referral pathways, and limited continuity of preventive care present significant challenges, particularly in rural communities. As a frontline health worker Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) are strategically positioned to support community-based stroke prevention; however, existing workflows are frequently constrained by multi-tasking, predominantly paper-based documentation and fragmented digital systems. Advances in mobile health, artificial intelligence along with digital health ecosystem provided by Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) provide an opportunity to strengthen community healthcare through integrated digital platforms. Objective This protocol describes the design, system architecture, and prospective evaluation framework of ASHA Assist India, an integrated AI-assisted mobile health platform intended to support community-based stroke prevention by connecting citizens, ASHA workers, Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and higher levels of healthcare facilities within a unified digital ecosystem. Methods ASHA Assist India has been designed as a modular, cloud-based digital health platform supporting standardized data collection, longitudinal health monitoring, referral management, and AI-assisted clinical decision support. The proposed system comprises four user-facing applications corresponding to citizens, ASHA workers, PHCs, and referral hospitals, integrated through a centralized backend providing authentication, secure data management, interoperability, analytics, and notification services. The AI framework includes three planned analytical modules: (i) population-level stroke risk stratification, (ii) longitudinal stroke risk prediction, and (iii) acute stroke symptom recognition. A prospective implementation study is planned to evaluate platform usability, feasibility, workflow integration, implementation outcomes, and operational performance within routine community healthcare settings. Future validation of the AI modules will be conducted using prospectively collected longitudinal datasets. Expected Impact The proposed platform aims to strengthen community-based stroke prevention by improving digital workflow integration, facilitating coordinated referral pathways, and supporting longitudinal monitoring through the existing healthcare providers at health and wellness centres like ASHA, Community Health Officers (CHOs), ANM, etc. Beyond stroke prevention, the modular architecture is intended to provide a scalable framework for future digital health programmes addressing multiple non-communicable diseases within primary healthcare systems. Publication of this protocol establishes a transparent implementation and evaluation framework that may guide future research, digital health innovation, and implementation science in resource-constrained settings.

Introduction: Computerized cognitive training (CCT) is a promising and innovative solution to improve the quality of life for those experiencing age-related cognitive decline. The comprehension of instructions for CCT plays a crucial role in determining technology engagement. This study delves into the relationship between the presentation modes of CCT serious games instructions, their comprehension, and the resulting acceptability among older adults (aged over 65) without any known cognitive impairments. Methodology: In a within-subjects experimental design, two types of CCT instructions were submitted to 128 older participants (mean age 71.5, 70% female): without visual cues and with visual cues. This approach was complemented by a study of the influence of self-efficacy and technology-related anxiety on the acceptability of the games. Results: Instructions without salient visual cues were more acceptable for a complex functional game. Additionally, individuals with lower confidence in their cognitive abilities were less receptive to cognitive training, except for a highly familiar game. Conclusion: The study highlights that older individuals may prefer simpler instructions for complex functional games, suggesting a preference for reduced cognitive load. It also shows the subtle role of self-efficacy in technology acceptance, except for the most familiar games, with higher cognitive self-confidence linked to greater acceptability. It emphasizes the importance of metacognition and self-efficacy in engagement when CCT involves mobilizing cognitive resources. It points the need for simple and personalized instructions to improve acceptance of CCT, and to contribute to the development of tailor-made interventions for older people.

Digital mental health tools are increasingly promoted as scalable supports for young people, yet implementation remains inconsistent, particularly for marginalised youth. Acceptability and usability are key determinants of successful adoption, but little is known about how these factors shape engagement across diverse youth populations. The aim of the study was to examine the acceptability, usability, and implementation potential of 11 evidence?based digital mental health tools among marginalised young people across the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI). A mixed?methods design integrated baseline surveys (n = 38), a two?week trial of digital tools delivered through a co?designed Google Site, online workshops/individual interviews (n = 22), and a final usability and engagement survey (n = 24). Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), engagement using the Twente Engagement with E?Health Technologies Scale (TWEETS), and mental wellbeing using the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well?Being Scale (SWEMWBS). Qualitative data were analysed thematically and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Only two tools exceeded the SUS usability benchmark. Engagement was moderate overall, with one tool achieving the highest engagement despite lower usability. SWEMWBS scores indicated moderate baseline mental wellbeing. Thematic analysis identified five acceptability themes: credibility and trust; accessibility and ease of use; positive content supporting emotional regulation; personalisation and self?monitoring; and engagement and habit formation. CFIR analysis highlighted usability, institutional trust, cultural relevance, and emotional needs as core implementation determinants. Digital literacy was high and supported engagement, and usability remained a critical gateway to implementation. Designers and commissioners of digital mental health tools should ensure that supports are simple, trustworthy, culturally relevant, and youth?centred to enable adoption among marginalised young people. Implementation strategies are needed that will co?design with diverse youth communities and prioritise youth work settings as well as governance clarity.

Objectives. To assess how digital inclusion factors and physical access barriers are associated with user trust in smartphone-based remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) hypertension screening, and to identify implications for digital health pol- icy, procurement and implementation in low-resource settings. Methods. Cross-sectional mixed-methods survey in five outpatient clinics in Kebbi State, northern Nigeria (N =287). Trust was measured using comfort, confidence and perceived usefulness Likert scales. Primary analyses used binary logistic models with HC3 robust standard errors; sensitivity analyses are reported in supplementary material. Free-text responses were thematically analysed. Results. Smartphone ownership was 51.2%; Transsion-brand devices comprised 56.5% of owners. Greater distance to a blood pressure facility was independently associated with lower perceived usefulness (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.87; p=0.013) and lower comfort (OR 0.61, 0.37-0.98; p=0.042). Among owners, Transsion versus Samsung showed higher confidence odds (OR 3.82, 1.02-14.27; p=0.046). Qualitative themes supported the implementation interpretation: platform-fit and device speed requests among Transsion owners; connectivity and offline-first concerns among those with greater travel distance. No brand contrast achieved FDR-adjusted significance; brand findings are exploratory. Conclusions. Digital health policy and health technology assessment for smartphone-based screening should incorporate local device ecology, connectivity constraints, physical access burden and trust-calibration safeguards. Pre-implementation assessment of these factors is necessary for equitable and safe rPPG adoption in low-resource health systems.

Patients with a brain tumour receive evidence-based clinical care in Australia but a focus on supportive care, including social connection, is often deficient. Digital health platforms hold promise to support these patients and their carers. Existing platforms often lack end-user co-design, evidence-based development and rigorous evaluation. Recognising this unmet need, we co-designed Brain Tumours Online, a digital supportive care platform to streamline access to educational resources, symptom management tools, and peer support for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. In this article, we present our evaluation approach for Brain Tumours Online to advance methodological thinking in the evaluation of multi-faceted, co-designed digital health platforms. In contrast to standardised procedures in clinical trials, digital health interventions such as supportive care platforms are more complex due to their interactive nature, no prescriptive protocols for usage and the dynamic content of web-based information. Thus, traditional evaluation approaches often fall short in evaluating such multi-faceted digital health supportive care platforms. To address these challenges, we developed a bespoke, logic-modelling based evaluation approach to assess the usability, engagement, impact, and economic value of our platform. Our pragmatic but rigourous evaluation approach required the adaptation of existing evaluation frameworks, subject-matter, and lived experience expert knowledge. Our implementation science and co-design approach are shared in different papers. Our study outcomes will also be shared in a separate paper. In the current paper, we share our approach to the evaluation of Brain Tumours Online and provide insights that may be of value for other researchers interested in the nuances of trialing multi-faceted digital health supportive care platforms.

Background: Older adults with vision impairment often experience barriers to using digital technology. The indirect associations between vision impairment and digital access and skills via digital self-efficacy and frustration among older adults remain largely unknown. Objective: This study aimed to 1) explore factors associated with digital access, skills, self-efficacy, and frustration among older adults with vision impairment; 2) examine associations between vision impairment and digital access, skills, self-efficacy, and frustration among older adults; and 3) examine whether digital self-efficacy and frustration may help explain associations between vision impairment and digital access and skills among older adults. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2024. Respondents aged 60 and older were included. Vision impairment was assessed using a self-reported item. Outcomes included self-reported digital access, skills, self-efficacy, and frustration. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression and generalized structural equation modeling were conducted, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and the number of comorbidities. Results: Among 3,149 older adults (mean [SD] age, 70.7 [10.0] years; 45.6% female), 7.1% (n=223) reported vision impairment. Among older adults with vision impairment, 65.6% (95% CI, 53.5% to 75.9%) used the internet daily, and 79.5% (95% CI, 66.8% to 88.2%) used a smartphone in the past 12 months. In multivariable logistic regression analyses among older adults with vision impairment, older age was associated with lower odds of daily internet use (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.90), smartphone use (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97), wearable device use (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.97), and using the internet to send a message to a healthcare provider (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.93). Older adults who self-identified as racial and ethnic minority groups (e.g., Black/African American, Hispanic) had lower odds of daily internet use (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.50) and using the internet to send a message to a healthcare provider (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.73) compared with Non-Hispanic White older adults. Vision impairment was associated with lower odds of daily internet use (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.99) and digital self-efficacy (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.86). Digital self-efficacy was associated with higher odds of daily internet use (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 2.04 to 4.26). Generalized structural equation modeling identified an indirect association between vision impairment and daily internet use via digital self-efficacy (coefficient, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.24 to -0.12). Conclusions: Findings suggest that reduced digital self-efficacy may help explain the observed association between vision impairment and daily internet use among older adults. Interventions targeting digital self-efficacy, including accessible interface designs, personalized coaching, and peer support, may help bridge the digital divide among older adults with vision impairment.

Objectives To identify stakeholder-perceived design tensions in a two-sided marketplace for reusable digital therapeutics (DTx) software components and to use these tensions to propose alternative marketplace concepts. Methods We conducted 24 semi-structured interviews with digital health researchers and professionals. Data were analysed using hybrid deductive-inductive codebook thematic analysis. The Magic Triangle provided the initial deductive structure. One researcher coded all transcripts; a second independently applied the developing codebook to five transcripts to refine definitions and consistency. Seventeen parent themes were synthesized into 12 design tensions, which informed three author-generated marketplace concepts. Results Participants described trade-offs concerning target users and host, component scope and customization, quality labels, verification, geographic scope, pricing, interoperability, platform launch, risks and market niche. The resulting concepts emphasized a regional startup ecosystem, a research-oriented hybrid marketplace or a global marketplace with stricter entry requirements. Discussion The concepts combine the tensions in different ways and highlight competing priorities in governance, openness, assurance, scalability and early platform growth. Conclusion Stakeholders identified recurring design choices for a DTx software-component marketplace. The concepts provide hypotheses for prototyping and evaluation; the study did not test technical feasibility, market demand, regulatory acceptability or effects on development cost or time.

Background: Digital health technologies, spanning mobile applications, telemedicine, and AI-driven platforms, are rapidly reshaping healthcare delivery globally. Although Generation Z university students are classified as digital natives, empirical data evaluating their eHealth literacy, technology acceptance, and specific trust barriers in developing South Asian nations like Sri Lanka remain scarce. Objective: This study evaluated eHealth literacy, technology acceptance, online health information-seeking behaviors, and adoption barriers among Gen Z undergraduates in Sri Lanka, focusing on the interplay between eHealth literacy, AI trust, and digital care preferences. Methods: A cross-sectional survey (N = 172) was conducted among Sri Lankan university undergraduates utilizing adapted, validated instruments: the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Statistical analysis included scale reliability validation (Cronbach's alpha), descriptive profiling, Chi-Square ({chi}{superscript 2}) contingency tests, Pearson correlations, and Multiple Linear OLS Regression models. Results: Participants demonstrated high overall eHealth literacy (Mean = 3.84 {+/-} 0.58) and strong endorsement of digital health utility (Mean = 3.99 {+/-} 0.59). Online health searches were reported by 86.6% of respondents. AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini) emerged as the second most frequent source for health queries (57.6%), surpassing YouTube (44.2%) and social media (26.2%), with medical students showing significantly higher AI utilization ({chi}{superscript 2} = 8.70, p = .003). In multiple regression analysis, digital platform preference over physical clinic visits (R{superscript 2} = .352, p < .001) was significantly predicted by Perceived Ease of Use ({beta} = 0.371, p = .001) and Trust in AI Recommendations ({beta} = 0.370, p < .001), whereas face-to-face consultation preference (76.7%) and personal data privacy risks (50.0%) remained predominant adoption barriers. Conclusion: Gen Z students in Sri Lanka exhibit high digital health readiness and substantial reliance on AI-driven information seeking. However, institutional deployment must address privacy concerns and integrate hybrid clinical workflows to bridge the gap between high perceived utility and physical consultation preferences.

Abstract Background: A critical challenge for large-scale multi-country population health studies is the ability to collect consistent data across many sites and time periods and ensure that the data collected are valid and comparable. The use of mobile digital devices coupled with data collection platforms can address this challenge. We developed a fit-for-purpose digital data collection platform for the South Asia Biobank study. Objective: To describe the process by which a digital platform was designed, developed and deployed across four countries in South Asia; to demonstrate how the platform enabled field research teams located across these countries to collect non-communicable diseases epidemiological data consistently. Methods: A user-centred design approach was employed for the development of the digital platform to address the dynamic nature of study requirements. This approach uses 5-step iterative loops that, with each iteration, produce a usable prototype version of the software that was then tested by potential users of the platform. Qualitative interviews and quantitative system usability assessments were conducted, and findings utilised as input for the start of the next iterative loop. The process was completed when a working version of the software was developed for the use in the study. Results: Over the course of four iterative loops, the platform was progressively built and tested to ensure its functionality met the requirements of the study. Detailed feedback was collected from key stakeholders and incorporated into the platform with each new version of the applications. The platform leverages advances in mobile and medical device technology along with software integration capabilities to enable efficient and consistent data collection, along with the ability to review data quality and make improvements to the data collection process in real-time. The successful deployment of the data platform has enabled collection of comprehensive baseline data from 205,536 participants in four South Asian countries. Conclusions: Using user-centred design principles, it is possible to develop and deploy a comprehensive digital surveillance data management platform that allows consistent and high-quality data collection in population health studies in remote settings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first platform that enables the integrated capture of health assessment data from a wide variety of medical equipment that is tailored for deployment in a range of LMIC settings.

Background: Polypharmacy is common in people living with dementia (PLwD) and associated with adverse outcomes. Although Structured Medication Reviews (SMRs) are recommended to optimise medication regimens, their delivery is often constrained by limited healthcare resources. Artificial intelligence (AI) may support SMRs, yet little is known about how it is perceived by PLwD and their carers. This study explored their experiences of polypharmacy, views on SMRs, and attitudes towards use of AI tools in SMRs. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 12 PLwD experiencing polypharmacy and two focus groups with 14 carers were conducted via Microsoft Teams or telephone and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Results: Two themes were constructed: experiences of SMRs, and attitudes towards AI in SMRs. Participants described challenges in managing polypharmacy, with carers often playing a central role in supporting adherence and monitoring side effects. Experiences of SMRs varied widely. SMRs were most valued when clinicians were empathetic and able to offer personalised guidance. Participants viewed AI use in SMRs positively, provided that such tools were well validated and used to assist rather than replace healthcare professionals. AI was viewed as having the potential to reduce administrative burden and support more person-centred care. However, some had concerns regarding patient safety and data security, highlighting the need for appropriate regulation and human oversight. Conclusion: Participants were supportive of AI use in SMRs, despite concerns about safety, data security and disclosure of AI use, and emphasised the importance of patient-clinician interactions and lived experience involvement in AI tool development.

The openEHR standard provides an open, vendor-neutral architecture for clinical data repositories (CDRs), yet its real-world deployment has not been systematically documented. We conducted a dual-perspective survey combining a vendor survey of openEHR CDR providers with a community survey of openEHR practitioners. Eleven vendor organisations reported deployments across 22 countries and over 100 institutions and health regions. A complementary community survey (n=29, 17 countries) provided context on regulatory environments, adoption drivers, and barriers. Combined, the surveys cover 28 countries, 26 of them with a reported openEHR CDR deployment. Three findings emerge: openEHR has achieved national-scale presence through two distinct channels. Through vendor-market convergence, openEHR-based systems cover the majority of regional health authorities without a national mandate, including 19 of 21 Swedish regions, 3 of 4 Norwegian health regions, and 16 of 21 Finnish wellbeing services counties. Through national health record adoption, governments have built or procured national systems on openEHR as their technical foundation, including Ireland, Malta, Greece, Jamaica and Slovenia. Across Europe, this constitutes an openEHR-based interoperability infrastructure already in place across multiple EU member states. We identified no country in which openEHR is named in binding national regulation, creating structural fragility and an unrealised opportunity for alignment with the European Health Data Space (EHDS). Second, 61% of deployments serve primary use only, and 12% support both primary and secondary use. Third, lack of openEHR-specific knowledge is the most consistent adoption barrier across all geographies and deployment tiers. Adoption is driven by practitioner need and innovation, not by regulatory mandate.

Objective. To evaluate the perceived usability, acceptability, and user experience (rather than the clinical effectiveness) of Boora, an AI-assisted, human-supervised digital platform prototype for longitudinal overweight and obesity care, among users and health professionals in Brazilian primary care. Design. Convergent mixed-methods formative evaluation. Perceived usability was measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS) and summarised descriptively; semi-structured interviews conducted after hands-on use were analysed with codebook thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke); the two strands were integrated through a joint display. Qualitative reporting followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Setting. Primary health care network of Ananindeua, Para, within the Brazilian Unified Health System (January to February 2026). Participants. Fifteen adults with overweight or obesity (BMI at least 25 kg/m2, confirmed via electronic health records) who used the patient application on their own smartphones for 24 hours, and eight primary care professionals (nurses, physicians, and a dietitian) who used the professional dashboard for approximately 20 minutes on predefined tasks with synthetic data. Main outcome measures. SUS scores and qualitative themes addressing usability, acceptability, perceived usefulness, barriers, and perceived clinical and workflow fit. Results. Boora showed good perceived usability in both cohorts (users mean 76.5, SD 10.3; professionals mean 77.5, SD 4.6; both above the SUS normative average of 68). Four themes emerged per cohort. Users valued an accessible interface and visible progress but described daily logging burden, fragile anticipated engagement, and digital-literacy and accessibility barriers. Professionals valued a clear interface and the prospect of panel-managed, proactive follow-up, while requiring training, AI governance, protected time, and interoperability with the national record. Integration indicated that the disengagement users anticipated was the risk professionals perceived the dashboard could help identify, whereas the educational AI assistant was the weakest and most ambiguous component for both groups. Conclusions. Boora was perceived as usable and acceptable, with perceived value concentrated in human-supervised, longitudinal follow-up rather than autonomous self-tracking or AI advice. These findings concern perceived usability and acceptability, not clinical effectiveness or sustained engagement. Real-world adoption would depend on accessibility refinements, electronic-record integration, and clear AI governance aligned with the principles of Brazil's proposed risk-based AI framework and the LGPD.

Whether diverse populations outside Western settings are behaviourally ready to integrate wearable-derived data into clinical care remains poorly understood. This study examines sociotechnical determinants of wearable adoption and digital health data-sharing readiness in a large, highly diverse multinational population in Qatar, a rapidly digitising health ecosystem with advanced eHealth infrastructure. We conducted a cross-sectional community-based survey of 3,004 adults across Qatar, assessing wearable device use, behavioural engagement, and willingness to integrate wearable-generated data into healthcare workflows. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of wearable adoption. Wearable device use prevalence was 34.1%. Behavioural factors were the strongest independent predictors of adoption: daily exercisers had more than four times the odds of wearable use compared with rarely active participants, and willingness to share data with healthcare providers was independently associated with adoption after full adjustment. Notably, education level was not independently associated with wearable use, suggesting that behavioural readiness outweighs traditional socioeconomic indicators as a determinant of digital health engagement. Older age ([&ge;]56 years) and African ethnicity were associated with lower adoption odds, highlighting persistent digital inequities. These findings challenge the assumption that digital health equity is primarily an education or access problem, repositioning it as a behavioural engagement challenge. Health systems scaling remote monitoring programmes should prioritise identifying behaviourally engaged subpopulations rather than relying solely on demographic targeting. Targeted digital engagement strategies addressing older adults and underrepresented ethnic groups are essential for equitable implementation of digital medicine.

Introduction: Extreme heat increasingly threatens older adults, particularly those with chronic conditions, yet generic heat-health advice may not be sufficiently timely or relevant to individual needs. This feasibility study describes a prototype and assesses the feasibility of a location-triggered, disease-specific heatwave short message service (SMS) intervention tailored to common heat-vulnerability conditions, compared with generic heatwave SMS advice. Methods: Mixed-methods feasibility study comprising a parallel two-arm 1:1 randomised controlled trial and post-heatwave focus groups. Community-dwelling Australians aged [&ge;]65 years in New South Wales, Victoria or South Australia with at least one eligible chronic condition (cardiovascular diseases, respiratory conditions, diabetes, and chronic kidney diseases) and a smartphone were recruited in summer 2026. Based on an initial codesign, participants received a 'prepare' SMS after enrolment and, when Bureau of Meteorology heatwave warnings were triggered, messages before, during and after heatwaves. Control participants received generic 'standard care' heat-health advice; intervention participants received condition-tailored messages and could request additional information via SMS codes. Outcomes were collected via baseline and post-heatwave surveys and thematic analysis of focus groups. Results: Seventy-three participants enrolled (36 control; 37 intervention); attrition was 9.6%. Intervention engagement was strong: 61% requested additional information, with frequent free-text replies and multi-condition requests indicating preference for more conversational interaction. Eight participants were heatwave-exposed and completed post-heatwave surveys (4 per arm), with a high usability score (median of 85/100). Among these 8 participants, 7 reported adopting heat-protective health behaviours; the most common were drinking more water (6/7). More total actions were reported in the intervention group (11 vs 8). No adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: A location-triggered, disease-tailored heatwave SMS system for older adults with chronic conditions was feasible, acceptable and highly usable, with high engagement and no harms. Findings support a larger trial and suggest benefits from tailored messaging.

Patients and caregivers seek informational and emotional support throughout medical care, especially when interpreting unfamiliar laboratory test results. Although resources such as patient portals and online health communities (OHCs) help address questions, gaps remain. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) offers the potential to be a complementary source of support to assist patients and caregivers in understanding and using their test results. The objective of our study is to empirically compare LLM responses to patients online questions containing their laboratory test results to responses written by peers in an OHC. We compared the 519 peer replies to 122 laboratory test-related posts from an OHC to 488 responses generated from four LLMs using mixed computational and qualitative methods. LLMs frequently provided clear explanations of medical terminology and structured interpretations of numeric results but were longer and less readable. Peers offered more personalized, context-specific emotional support. Overall, LLMs have the potential to complement peer responses in OHCs, but require greater emotional depth, reasoning transparency, and alignment with community norms.

Digital technologies can support meaningful social interaction by providing personally relevant prompts for memory, communication, and shared reflection. In later life, mobile phone photography may offer an accessible medium through which older adults and caregivers construct stories, express meaning, and participate in relational engagement. However, limited psychophysiological evidence is available on how digital photo supported storytelling engages cognitive and social processes in older adult caregiver dyads. This study examined alpha band EEG dynamics during digital photo elicited storytelling in two museum settings. Thirty two older adult caregiver dyads completed cognitive and psychological screening and participated in a museum-based storytelling protocol. During the museum visit, participants used mobile-phone photography to capture personally meaningful objects, scenes, or exhibition spaces. Each participant then selected one photograph as a digital prompt for a structured but naturalistic storytelling interaction. EEG was recorded during eyes closed resting, eyes open resting, storytelling, and listening conditions. Relative alpha power was analyzed using a predefined 10 electrode sensor level set. Task related alpha modulation was examined relative to eyes open resting. Associations between Cz alpha power and MoCA scores were tested, and dyad level alpha band inter brain similarity was explored using spatial alpha power patterns with within site shuffled dyad surrogate comparisons. Alpha power was higher during eyes closed resting and lower during storytelling and listening relative to eyes-open resting, indicating task-related alpha modulation during digital photo supported narrative interaction. Associations between MoCA scores and Cz alpha power were weak, condition-specific, and did not survive false discovery rate correction. During storytelling, dyad level alpha-band inter brain similarity was modestly higher than within site shuffled dyad estimates, but this effect did not remain significant after correction across conditions. These findings suggest that digital photo elicited storytelling can provide a meaningful medium for studying cognitive and social engagement in older adult caregiver dyads. Alpha band EEG activity was sensitive to storytelling and listening, although cognition related and dyadic similarity effects were modest. The study contributes to research on technology supported human behavior by showing how digital image prompts can structure naturalistic social interaction while enabling psychophysiological measurement in real-world contexts.

Visual wayfinding is essential for safe navigation but remains poorly characterized in people with ultra-low vision (ULV). Because assessing complex environments in the real world carries safety risks, this study utilized a calibrated virtual reality (VR) platform to safely quantify navigation. Participants with ULV, normal vision (NV), and simulated ULV (sULV) completed tasks across three environments (street crossing, cafeteria, and metro station) of increasing complexity to determine which metrics best capture task difficulty. Navigation metrics included motion onset latency, walking speed, path efficiency, and turn deviation derived from head position data. Participants with ULV showed longer onset latency, slower walking speed, reduced path efficiency, and greater turn deviation compared with NV, while sULV showed intermediate performance. These metrics successfully reflected increasing task difficulty across environments, with the metro station posing the greatest challenge. Path efficiency consistently detected differences between environments across groups, whereas turn deviation provided insight into complex tasks. Findings indicate that diverse virtual environments capture distinct aspects of navigation that cannot be safely studied in the real world, and trajectory-based metrics capture navigation behavior more effectively than conventional measures. VR-based assessment offers a useful approach for evaluating functional navigation and guiding rehabilitation strategies in profound vision loss.

Background. General purpose generative AI (GenAI) chatbots are increasingly used by students for mental health support. Research on prevalence estimates vary widely, rarely link use to validated clinical measures, and have not been reported in a Canadian student population. We estimated the prevalence trends, patterns, perceived impact, and correlates of GenAI use for mental health support among Canadian university students. Methods. We analysed one year (May 2025 to April 2026) repeated cross-sectional data from the Canadian arm of the WHO World Mental Health International College Student survey (WMH-ICS) The primary outcome was past-year prevalence of GenAI use for mental health support. Specific use purposes, perceived impact, reasons for non-use, and future use intent were also analysed. Factors associated with GenAI use were assessed using modified Poisson regression. As a sensitivity analysis, an elastic-net penalised regression model was fitted to assess the robustness of findings to an alternative modelling approach. Results. The past-year prevalence of GenAI chatbot use for mental health support was 25.2% (95% CI: 22.7 - 27.9), with a lifetime prevalence of 30.2%. Use was mostly occasional and predominately for seeking mental health information, stress management, and emotional support/companionship. Students of Asian ethnicity, those with higher clinical burden, recent adverse life experiences, weaker social support, and prior digital help-seeking behaviours were more likely to use GenAI for mental health purposes. Conversely, 2SLGBTQ+ students and those with romantic partners were less likely. Nearly three-quarters (74.2%) of users perceived such use to have a positive impact on their mental health and emotional wellbeing. Non-users reported preference for human interaction, distrust of GenAI in mental health (67.4% each), and privacy/security concerns (50.3%). Non-use also reflected principled objections to AI, including ethical and environmental concerns, with most non-users indicating no future use intention. Conclusions. GenAI chatbot use for mental health support has become commonplace among Canadian university students and is concentrated among those with greater mental health needs and fewer social support resources. Although most users perceived these tools as beneficial, their clinical effectiveness and safety remain uncertain. Rigorous prospective studies are needed to determine whether perceived benefits translate into improved mental health outcomes and whether purpose-built GenAI mental health interventions offer greater clinical benefit and safety than general-purpose chatbots.

TikTok has become a significant source of health information, and concern has grown about AI-generated content (henceforth, 'AIGC') as a vehicle for health misinformation. Where AIGC presents realistic-appearing people giving health advice, disclosure labels are the viewer's only reliable cue that what they are watching is synthetic. This research letter compares AI label metadata across 128,016 mental health-related TikTok videos and 4,924 videos from a network of 50 profiles posting exclusively AI-generated mental health content to evaluate how much content reaches audiences undisclosed. In a keywords-based collection, fewer than a percent of TikTok videos about mental health carried an AI label, but in profiles containing purely AI-generated content, just over 9 in 10 videos (90.23%) were neither labelled by the creator nor identified by TikTok's automatic detection. Additionally, in the keyword collection, automatic detection produced the majority of labels, while in confirmed AI-generated content from 50 profiles, it accounted for just three of the 481 labelled videos. These findings highlight the challenging landscape of AI disclosure and labelling and raise questions about where automatic detection is failing.